Quantcast
Channel: Flickering Myth
Viewing all 7138 articles
Browse latest View live

Skyfall becomes Sony's biggest release of all-time

$
0
0
Last week the James Bond movie franchise celebrated its 50th anniversary in style when Skyfall surpassed James Cameron's Avatar to become the highest-grossing film of all-time on home soil, and having returned to the top of both the UK and US box office charts at the expense of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2, 007's 23rd screen adventure has now claimed another record with the film overtaking Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3 to become Sony's biggest ever release.

As of today (Sunday), Skyfall is currently sitting on a world-wide haul of $918 million, making it the third-biggest hit of 2012 behind The Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises. With the film still going strong in most markets - not to mention the fact its yet to open in China, which is becoming an increasingly lucrative market for Western releases - there seems to be every chance that the acclaimed spy thriller will go on to crack $1 billion at the global box office, where it would become only the fourteenth film in history to do so.

Directed by Sam Mendes, Skyfall sees Daniel Craig and Judi Dench returning as Bond and M alongside an impressive cast that includes Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men), Ralph Fiennes (Great Expectations), Ben Wishaw (Cloud Atlas), Naomie Harris (28 Days Later), Albert Finney (The Bourne Legacy), Helen McCrory (Hugo), Bérénice Marlohe (R.I.S. Police scientifique) and Ola Rapace (Wallander).

Peep Show Series 8 - Episode 3 Review

$
0
0
Luke Owen reviews the third episode of Peep Show series eight...


The last two weeks have been particularly hard to sit through as a Peep Show fan. It’s quite hard to be a massive fan of something only to watch it produce mediocre to poor efforts that make you want to put on a DVD of the first series to remind you why you liked it in the first place – a bit like being that Sega fan waiting for a good Sonic game. But episode 3 did something I've wanted since the start of series 8 – some good laughs.

“The Love Bunker” will hardly go down as one of the all time great Peep Show episodes, but it had everything that made Peep Show such an endearing series – Mark being incredibly socially awkward, Jeremy thinking he’s doing something right but really he’s making things worse and the pair of them being thrown into a situation that is completely out of their control. There were some funny jokes, some hilarious lines of dialogue and loads of Super Hans.

Granted, it wasn't a perfect episode. There was a scene towards the end that started off funny, but didn’t lead to anything in particular. Mark and Super Hans talking about “doing a poo” in their bunker was really funny because the word “poo” is hilarious when said over and over again (if a little childish). But the actual act of Mark doing it lead to nothing but a few Napoleon jokes. You would have thought this would be the episode’s laugh-out-loud moment (like Dobby finding him for example), but instead it just seemed like a cheap joke that was only there to pad out the episode.

I like that the series is finally starting to move along the relationship of Dobby and Mark, even it has arrived in the most contrived of fashions. Because they don’t act like a couple, you tend to forget that they’re together aside from a few lines from Mark reminding us that she is his girlfriend. But with Jeremy’s new “love” for her, we might be getting a really entertaining series long plot thread. I've never really liked Dobby as a character, but I really warmed to her in this episode – despite her being so one dimensional.

For me, the highlight of the episode was ‘band name’ game they play with Simon and his online friends. Between Super Hans and Jeremy burying the music industry with their narcissistic views and Mark pretending he knows more bands than Snow Patrol and The Beatles, this has been the best scene from the series so far. Mark trying to act like he’s normal in social situations is what makes him such a brilliant character.

The last two episodes of Peep Show's eighth series have been less than stellar, I'm hoping that “The Love Bunker” is the turning point for the series and we’ll start getting some half decent episodes. However, it could just be the case that my standards for this show are now so low that anything above ‘alright’ is considered a mark in the win column. Time will ultimately tell, but let’s see if this momentum carries over into episode four.

Luke Owen is a freelance copywriter working for Europe’s biggest golf holiday provider as their web content executive.

Skyfall takes back the top spot at North American cinemas

$
0
0
Skyfall seized the top spot at theaters in an admittedly slow weekend.  The most successful James Bond film of all time has held strong since its release nearly a month ago and once again became the biggest movie in America with $11 million in tickets sold.  The fact that this is the biggest Bond movie of all time isn't nearly as shocking as the margin of separation between Skyfall and the other recent Bond entries.   Worldwide, the final difference between Skyfall and Casino Royale could be $400 million dollars.  That is a staggering number.  I'm be lying if I said I understood the recipe for success here.  I have no earthly idea why Skyfall will outperform Royale and Quantum of Solace by nearly half a billion dollars.  All I can say is, lock Mendes down for another one, fast.  

The family friendly under performer Rise of the Guardians ended up in second place with $10 million in ticket sales.  Even mediocre holiday films can end up hanging around.  Though I have a feeling The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is going to take what little thunder Guardians has left.  These harmless little animated movies wouldn't be so disappointing if they didn't cost $150 million to produce.

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 continues to wind down earning another $9.1 million. When the final tally is taken, Skyfall may end up winning the box office battle here in the United States.  That is something nobody saw coming.  And frankly, it's a little encouraging.

Spielberg's Lincoln holds strong in fourth place with $9 million in ticket sales continuing its loud march into award season.  At this point, Lincoln and Argo will both be $100+ million earners when the major award nominations start being made.  Robert Zemeckis' Flight is also slowly making it's way to the $100 million mark (right now at $86 million and holding strong at the bottom half of the top ten)  The respectable box office is helping these films stake a claim in what should be a pretty interesting award season. Speaking of...

On this side of the pond, the major speculation is that Zero Dark Thirty will be the film to beat, with a very vocal minority claiming the musical Les Miserables will be a sentimental favorite with voters.  If I were a gambling man (and I am), these are the films I'm guessing will get Best Picture nominations:

Argo
Lincoln
Flight
Zero Dark Thirty
Les Miserables
Silver Lining Playbook
Moonrise Kingdom

and my dark horse pick:

Beasts of the Southern Wild

There's always one low budget sentimental favorite that makes its way into the Best Picture category.  While it didn't set the box office on fire in its limited release, Beasts of the Southern Wild has a lot of supporters.

Playing for Keeps on the other hand had no supporters and a 2% rating at Rotten Tomatoes.  Only Leonard Maltin found anything favorable to say about the Gerrard Butler romantic comedy which left audiences ambivalent.  The film couldn't even crack the top five earning a measly $6 million in its opening weekend.  Not even enough to beat Life of Pi which took in $8 million, which was good enough for the number five spot.

Next week sees the release of the most anticipated film of the holiday season: Amour - the unsentimental look at an octogenarian who suffers a stroke putting their relationship in jeopardy. Oh, and there's this other film opening up by a guy from New Zealand named Peter Jackson who has adapted this book by J.R.R. Tolkien called The Hobbit.  Apparently it's a fantasy film.  I'm not really sure if anyone's interested.  I guess we'll find out next week.

Here's your top films for North America...

1. Skyfall
Weekend Estimate: $11 million; $261 million total

2. Rise of the Guardians
Weekend Estimate: $10 million; $61 million total

3. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
Weekend Estimate: $9.1 million; $268 million total

4. Lincoln
Weekend Estimate: $9 million; $97 million total

5. Life of Pi
Weekend Estimate: $8 million; $60 million total

Anghus Houvouras

16th UK Jewish Film Festival Retrospective - A conversation with Judy Ironside, Director of the UKJFF

$
0
0
Paul Risker chats with Judy Ironside, Director of the 16th UK Jewish Film Festival...

The embracing of past and present was undoubtedly one of the highlights of the 16th edition of the UK Jewish Film Festival. Opening with the directorial feature debut of Sophie Lellouche, Paris-Manhattan, the UKJFF welcomed violinist and Artistic Director of The Jewish Music Institute Sophie Solomon, to perform a live musical accompaniment at a special screening of Edward Sloman’s 1925 silent film, His People. “The screening of His People was most certainly added to expand the breadth of the UKJFF and we are always looking at ways to do this.   We think it is vital to work with new filmmakers as much as possible, but it is wonderful when a silent film can be such a huge success when live music of such quality is also on the programme.”

For the first time in sixteen years the UK Jewish Film Festival expanded to venues across the country, with Judy overseeing a new kind of expansion in 2012. “We have screened in towns and cities beyond London for many years, and of course we started in Brighton.   But we have always sent films on tour after the Festival in London.   We felt it was important this year to see the Festival as a whole across the UK and this has proved to be a great success.  In fact we already have numerous people writing to ask if we will include their town or city in 2013, and we will be looking at all of these requests.”

Interviewing writer-directors, one of the themes or ideas that arises regularly is the idea that cinema is more than just entertainment. The ideological origin of the festival, intent on channelling the voice of filmmakers discussing Jewish themes, embraces this approach to film. At this year’s festival, over seventy films were screened, the festival expanding beyond a celebration of Jewish film, to celebrate the power of the image and its potential. “We believe that film is a hugely powerful art form and one that encompasses the power to transform stories into both fiction and non-fiction films.   Whilst the majority of films are highly entertaining, we also want to show films that challenge people's views and require of them to move out of their comfort zones and consider other ways and ideas - even this sort of film can, of course, prove to be entertaining!   UKJFF has a unique opportunity to bring films that would not otherwise be screened in the UK, and with these films we can offer our audiences the chance to see the topics and Jewish themes that are being used by filmmakers across the world, and thereby expand their understanding of Jewish cultures worldwide.”

The UKJFF exploits cinema as a cultural tool, a window if you like through which audiences and filmmakers alike can explore religion and culture. With an opportunity to speak with Judy, I sought to discover what for her makes cinema such a powerful tool for broadening our horizons in comparison to the written word. “We believe that film is very accessible to such a wide and diverse audience.   Cinema is a shared experience, and the UKJFF can even go beyond to provide cinema plus, which frequently offers the chance to meet the filmmakers, producers and actors, and thereby share the experience in a very personal sense.  Whereas, for the most part the written word is a more solitary experience - film opens up huge vistas and explores enormous issues in a comparatively short space of time, and to a large audience who can then discuss and debate their reactions and impressions.”

Jewish Film UK works to promote Jewish cinema beyond the festival, organising events and screenings throughout the year. Following the success of the 16th edition of the festival, their enthusiasm to champion Jewish cinema during the next twelve months represents an exciting time for everyone involved with Jewish Film UK. “We are hugely encouraged by the public response to the 16th UKJFF, and there are already many people waiting for us to bring back some of the most popular films.  However, we now operate year round and there are many previews and premieres waiting to be screened in the early part of 2013. We very much hope that everyone has added their name to our database so that they can receive news of all the events throughout the year.   We have also launched a Membership Scheme, and those who join will be invited to special screenings and events that are just for Members - so we very much hope that this Scheme will grow and grow and that our audiences will support and acknowledge our work and get the benefits as well.”

Inevitably nearing the end of the calendar year, this will be a moment when Judy will assess the success of Jewish Film UK, whilst looking ahead to the challenges to be encountered in 2013. “This has been such a strong year for UKJFF and the feedback has been so positive.  But this does not mean that we will consider sitting back and relaxing our energy and creative thinking - this has driven us to go forwards into 2013 with new energy and to listen, as always, to our audiences and bring the best of international films with Jewish themes.” There appears to be a definite focus going forward for Jewish Film UK. Judy added, “We are also increasing our work with partner organisations and we hope to be working more with young people to introduce them to the power of film, and extend their ideas and creative responses to the world around them.”

Thanks to Judy Ironside for taking the time for this interview.

Paul Risker is a freelance writer and contributor to Flickering Myth, Scream The Horror Magazine and The London Film Review.

Movie Review - The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)

$
0
0
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, 2012.

Directed by Peter Jackson.
Starring Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage, Ian Holm, Elijah Wood, Hugo Weaving, Cate Blanchett, Andy Serkis, Christopher Lee, Sylvester McCoy, Barry Humphries, Lee Pace, Ken Stott, Graham McTavish, William Kircher, James Nesbitt, Stephen Hunter, Dean O'Gorman, Aidan Turner, John Callen, Peter Hambleton, Jed Brophy, Mark Hadlow, Adam Brown and Benedict Cumberbatch.



SYNOPSIS:

A Hobbit sets off on a journey to the Lonely Mountain with a group of Dwarves to reclaim treasure stolen from them by the fearsome dragon Smaug.


The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit have the obvious connotations of fantasy, yet there is also the notion of time attached to the works. All books took a considerable time to write (with J.R.R. Tolkien attempting numerous rewrites on The Hobbit) and the author was the grand age of 63 when his follow up to Bilbo's story, the trilogy on that "precious" ring, was published. When we think of the seminal novels, thoughts of long-winded description and hundreds-upon-hundreds of pages are not uncommon. In contemporary terms the stories are largely associated with Peter Jackson's epic adaptations - the saga that lasted from 2001 - 2003 and a further trilogy starting now in 2012 and finishing in 2014. Watching the adaptions thus far will take a hefty 727 minutes (and that's not counting the extended versions' run times), a time that could easily be matched by reading the books themselves, depending on your reading speed. There has, arguably, never been an adaption of a series of works that has gone beyond the full ten yards in order to engage the audience with that specific world. The Hobbit is no different; it is a grand spectacle filled with meaty action, vibrant aesthetics and stories and characters never to be forgotten (just remember to have a bathroom break before it begins).

For those not completely won over by the events of The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit could equally disappoint. It is advertised as more frolicsome and funny than The Lord of the Rings but this is not always the case with the film. The beginning, which introduces Bilbo and the Dwarves, contains many amusing skits and songs but once the journey begins it recaptures the style of the now-classic trilogy. Swooping shots of the scenery along with Howard Shore's beautiful score are both help and hindrances to this new addition. In one sense, it reminds of you of how easy it is to fall in love with this world. However, these features also become overly-reminiscent of films past, sometimes distracting for when you need to be in the modern moment.

For the most part The Hobbit is boasting something very new. Not only does it focus on a story 60 years before the Fellowship was established, it enhances all of the technology once used to bring Middle-earth to life. Shot in 3D and 48fps (double the regular 24 frames per second to smooth out movement), The Hobbit is a dazzling new display of Tolkien's imagination. The mines, caves and shrubbery that makes up a large portion of the landscape is layered thanks to the 3D. What's more, the frame rate (that may go unnoticed by some) is quite astonishing at points. The handheld camera work that can often disorientate in films has a fluidity with the 48fps, perfected with the static shots. Both technologies together animate the action far beyond any previous cinematic means - purely immersive.

Even with an aesthetic that never fails to keep you wide-eyed, the film does have its moments of tedium. Just as The Lord of the Rings had scenes of dull exposition, The Hobbit is not without its moments of informative, though dreary, dialogue. With Jackson stretching out the 300 page book (give or take) to three films, the tried nature of this approach can sometimes seem blatant. The Rivendale sequence, for instance, reeks of some superfluousness. At times this added material lends itself well for characters, though can also spoil it. The appearance of Saruman should be a moment of sheer delight (especially given Sir Christopher Lee's fragile state) though he is mostly muted in preference of Gandalf and Galadriel's mind-messaging. 

It is often the smaller roles within the film that garner more attention than the key players (Bilbo, Gandalf, Elrond and Galadriel). Sylvester McCoy as Radagast, Barry Humphries as the Great Goblin and Andy Serkis back as Gollum (known by many but with only a minor part in this trilogy) eat up their scenes with extremely pleasing results. All three characters have dialogue that could have easily made the remaining cast jealous - all playing larger-than-life roles in some pivotal scenes. With two played under the guise of a motion-capture suit it may be easy to dismiss their performance - or to forget the actors beneath the CGI - but the Great Goblin and Gollum are wonderfully, frighteningly real.

The final words of mention should go towards Martin Freeman taking the reigns of this entire film, and his accompanying Dwarves. Ian Holm's sweet, antiquated Bilbo was one of the many loveable side-characters of The Lord of the Rings - a brief part in The Hobbit's prologue sternly reminds you of his influence. It takes some time to get used to Bilbo as the lead as you may have forgotten the somewhat pedantic, obstinate ways of the Bag End resident. Freeman plays this with perfection, though it is easy to take this as a negative - the subtle grumpiness to the character does not make the most admirable hero. The charm that is an innate part of Ian Holm is yet to be discovered in Freeman (probably due to his age) and he is not always the idyllic leading man. It takes the entire film for Bilbo to emerge as the familiar hero figure - putting him in good stead for the following two films - making him a tad unlikeable and irritating throughout most of An Unexpected Journey.

Joining Bilbo on his quest is a pack of feral, boisterous Dwarves. Each has a unique personality (not all profiles fully illustrated so far) and make for a memorable movie mob. Focus is put on Richard Armitage as Thorin (leading man in the film's superb battle scenes), an skeptical warrior whose objective and blood-line comes first. He makes for an interesting foil to Bilbo in many segments, and an even better enemy of the Pale Orc Azog (a villain that brings a tremendous amount of ruckus). Much like the key-players, however, Thorin is not the most interesting of the Dwarves and the jovial Bofur (played by the ever-affable James Nesbitt) and "Doc" Dwarf Balin (Ken Stott) prove to be the best of the bunch. There is little fault in Freeman and Armitage's performances, it's mainly down to their character and their lack of experience at the forefront of a blockbuster.

Everyone will have their favourite Dwarf (if not by the end of The Hobbit, then certainly by its second sequel in 2014) and discussion will erupt over who should be seen as the chief character between Bilbo, Thorin and Gandalf when it comes to The Hobbit. Outside of the story there will be no question over the man in charge. It would have been intriguing and imaginably entertaining to see what Guillermo del Toro would have brought to his vision of the text, yet the man at the helm since 2001 is suitably standing in as director. Peter Jackson, who knows Middle-earth better than nearly anyone, lovingly restores the tokens of Tolkien with an exciting new cast, memorable alumni, an enchanting story and an awe-inspiring aesthetic. Some may have grown tired of this world but for those eager to get back to it, The Hobbit gives and sets up what every fan is itching for - adventure.

Flickering Myth Rating - Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★  / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Piers McCarthy - Follow me on Twitter.

2012, You Weren't Half Bad...

$
0
0
YouTuber SleepySkunk has edited together a rather wonderful mashup of movie trailers from 2012.

http://www.hdwallpapers.in/walls/2012_movie-normal.jpg
By 2012 in movies, this isn't what we mean.
It goes through three parts - the horror/action movie build (Resident Evil: Retribution, Prometheus, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter), the comedy hijinks (Project X, Wreck-It Ralph, Tim and Eric's Billion Dollar Movie) and the overwhelmingly epic (The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Life of Pi, Cloud Atlas).



The parts overlap, with many, many other films used (for a full list, jump over to SleepySkunk's Tumblr). For instance, Dredd 3D cameos in the comedy part, but because the shots are linked so well visually - from fire to explosion, from tracking shot to tracking shot - the video feels like one big trailer.

2012 ain't over yet. But blimey, there were some bloody good films out this year.*


*The Amazing Spider-Man not included.

Will Ferrell and Kevin Hart set to Get Hard at Warner Bros.

$
0
0
Warner Bros. is developing a new comedy film entitled Get Hard, which is based on a script written by Ian Roberts and Jay Martel, who are currently executive producers of the very funny Comedy Central show Key & Peele.

According to Deadline, Get Hard will star Will Ferrell (Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy) and Kevin Hart (Think Like a Man) and centres on a rich, soft-handed investment bank manager (Ferrell) who is sentenced to a maximum security prison for a crime he didn’t commit. He hires the streetwise guy (Hart) who normally washes his car to get him ready to do hard time in the 30 days before he has to report to prison.

Earlier this year Hart signed on to star in About Last Night, a remake of the 1986 Brat Pack film starring Demi Moore (A Few Good Men) and Rob Lowe (The West Wing), which was based on David Mamet's (Glengarry Glen Ross) play Sexual Perversity in Chicago. Will Ferrell is currently working on the much anticipated sequel to his hit 2004 comedy Anchorman, which will see him reprise his role as the number one newsman in San Diego, Ron Burgundy.

A new poster for Michael Bay's Pain & Gain

$
0
0
A new official poster from forthcoming bodybuilding comedy Pain & Gain has been unveiled. Following on from the teaser poster from earlier this year, courtesy of Yahoo! Movies we now get to see stars of the Michael Bay (Transformers: Dark of the Moon) film, Dwayne “The Rock “ Johnson (G.I. Joe: Retaliation) and Mark Wahlberg (The Fighter) looking like two men you wouldn’t want to mess with:


Based on the unbelievable true story of three personal trainers in 1990s Miami who, in pursuit of the American Dream, get caught up in a criminal enterprise that goes horribly wrong. The film also stars Anthony Mackie (The Hurt Locker), Ed Harris (A Beautiful Mind), Tony Shalhoub (Men in Black), Rob Corddry (What Happens in Vegas), Rebel Wilson (Pitch Perfect) and Bar Paly (A Glimpse Inside the Mind of Charles Swan III) and is based on magazine articles by Pete Collins, with a screenplay by Christopher Markus (The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe) & Stephen McFeely (Captain America: The First Avenger).

Pain & Gain is due to be released on April 26th, 2013.

The Flickering Myth Reaction to the Star Trek Into Darkness teaser trailer

$
0
0
The Flickering Myth writing team discuss the first teaser trailer for Star Trek Into Darkness...

The internet came to a standstill last Thursday as Paramount Pictures presented us with the first footage from Star Trek Into Darkness with the release of an online exclusive teaser trailer that gave us a glimpse at what's in store when director J.J. Abrams unleashed his hotly-anticipated and hugely-secretive sci-fi sequel this coming May.

While The Daily Mail would have us believe that Star Trek fans are in uproar over a perceived lack of originality - stemming from an extra shot in the Japanese trailer teasing what appears to be Abrams' nod towards the classic scene between Kirk and Spock from the classic Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan - much of the debate centred around the impressive visuals and epic action sequences, not to mention the most burning question of all - just who the hell is Benedict Cumberbatch playing?

Of course, it wasn't all entirely positive, with the bleak tone and use of voice-over drawing comparisons to the recent Iron Man 3 trailer, while the musical score also seemed to rely heavily on the 'BWARM' technique patented by Hans Zimmer. Like Luke Owen suggested in his opinion piece here on Flickering Myth, the teaser itself was fairly generic, but it's certainly whet our appetites for the arrival of the full-length theatrical trailer, as well as getting both Trekkers and non-Trekkers talking about Star Trek. With that in mind, here's the views of our writing team...


Chris Cooper: As a few people have pointed out, it's highly reminiscent of both the The Dark Knight Rises and Iron Man 3 teasers. Intriguingly-voiced villain prophesying the destruction of something or other. But I can forgive that, as Cumberbatch sounds great and the visuals (especially the Enterprise hitting the water money shot) look fantastic. I'm not a huge Trek fan, but the 2009 reboot was really good, and hopefully they can keep it up. Looks promising.

Gary Collinson: It's pretty much everything you could ask for from a first teaser trailer. Stunning visuals, what looks to be huge action set pieces, and absolutely nothing given away. Judging by the online response, the marketing campaign looks to be off to a perfect start and from what little we've seen so far, Into Darkness looks like it could be one of 2013's best. Oh, and I suspect it's going to be tremendous in IMAX.

Kirsty Capes: I agree with Gary, looks like the visuals are going to be even better than 2009, if that's even possible. I'm not an action kinda gal but EXPLOSIONS EVERYWHERE and ugh I love it; really excited to see Zachary Quinto and Chris Pine back as Kirk and Spock, although not sure how that dynamic is going to play out after the conclusion of the last film. Also Benedict Cumberbatch is going to be an amazing villain. Majorly excited for this. Not impressed with the music being ripped straight off Prometheus though?

Martin Deer: As a non-Trekkie I was really impressed with the 2009 reboot and I'm liking this trailer. Effects looks great and it appears we could be in for a great conflict between Pine's Kirk and whomever Cumberbatch is playing. Looking forward to it. The music is very Inception / Dark Knight-ish. but then a lot of trailers seem to be taking influence from Zimmer's scores lately.

Piers McCarthy: Less lens-flare, thank goodness! (Always hate Abrams' obsession with that bloody effect). As we know from the first one, the cast are perfectly molded to their characters and Cumberbatch is a perfect addition. Same with Martin, I know little-to-nothing about Star Trek but was majorly impressed by the reboot. I will certainly be buying a ticket for this one (despite Abrams' occasional silly stylistic flourishes, he knows how to produce entertainment).

Liam Trim: I really wasn't sure about Cumberbatch as a villain at first, or at least as a generic blockbuster villain. Even from this trailer though it looks as though he's put his own stamp on this role. Future Bond villain anyone? As for the rest of the trailer, I'm excited for the film and the premise of the story seems good - so I'd say it's a success.

Helen Murdoch: All you want from a teaser. Really good choice making Cumberbatch's unnamed villain the focus. It definitely delivers on the "bigger darker" sequel idea. This was a Kirk centric trailer so I hope to see some more of Spock, Bones, et al. There is the Inception style music in there but this seems to be standard at the moment. Definitely excited for the full trailer.

Oliver Davis: I flat-out started weeping at my work desk when I saw it. Kirk touching Spock's hand through the glass brought Wrath of Khan flooding back into heart. Which teases the question: is Khan Into Darkness' villain?

Gary Collinson: I'm not so sure it's Kirk's hand - going by the colour, the sleeve looks very much like it could belong to Benedict Cumberbatch - perhaps it's a deliberate attempt to throw us off the scent...

Trevor Hogg: I find that all of these world destruction movies are so overblown. There have been so many and there are many more to come.  The trailer for the latest incarnation of Star Trek is part of the same tireless trend.  It will be up to the villain to save the story and Benedict Cumberbatch certainly has dramatic range to do so; I hope he is not playing Khan as it seems funny with these franchise reboots to simply repeat the adversaries from the previous versions.


In general, there seems to be plenty of excitement for Star Trek Into Darkness here at Flickering Myth HQ, and like everyone, we're all completely stumped by the identity of Benedict Cumberbatch's villain. Is he Khan? Gary Mitchell? Dr. Tolian Soran? Evil Picard? According to reports, the upcoming 9-minute IMAX prologue won't offer any answers, so we can probably assume the full-length trailer won't be giving anything away either. I guess we'll find out on May 17th, 2013 when Star Trek Into Darkness arrives in cinemas...

What did you think of the first teaser trailer for Star Trek Into Darkness? Be sure to leave your comments below...

First trailer for M. Night Shyamalan's After Earth

$
0
0
Over the past few days we've had our first glimpse at two of next year's big science fiction offerings in Star Trek Into Darkness and Oblivion and now we can add a third to that list, with the first trailer for M. Night Shyamalan's sci-fi thriller After Earth surfacing online today via MSN.

Shyamalan hasn't been on the top of his game lately (his last decent movie came back in 1999, 2000, 2002 or 2004, depending on how much goodwill you afforded him for The Sixth Sense), so naturally he'll be hoping that the combination of father and son team Will and Jaden Smith will be enough to halt a career slump that's culminated with a trio of absolute abominations in Lady in the Water, The Happening and The Last Airbender

"A crash landing leaves teenager Kitai Raige (Jaden Smith) and his legendary father Cypher (Will Smith) stranded on Earth, 1,000 years after cataclysmic events forced humanity’s escape. With Cypher critically injured, Kitai must embark on a perilous journey to signal for help, facing uncharted terrain, evolved animal species that now rule the planet, and an unstoppable alien creature that escaped during the crash. Father and son must learn to work together and trust one another if they want any chance of returning home."


So, what's the twist in this one, then? I'm guessing it's actually set way, way back in the past, and Jaden Smith is going to end up being Adam. Or, if Shyamalan really wants to shock us, how about it turns out to be... watchable?

After Earth is set for release on June 7th, 2013, with a supporting cast that includes Isabelle Fuhrman (The Hunger Games), Kristofer Hivju (Game of Thrones), Gabriel Caste (Frozen Lies) and Zoe Kravitz (X-Men: First Class).

Benedict Cumberbatch's Star Trek Into Darkness bad guy revealed and Klingons confirmed

$
0
0
From the moment it was announced that J.J. Abrams was to direct a follow-up to his 2009 sci-fi pseudo-reboot Star Trek there's been a tonne of speculation over the identity of the film's villain, with things really intensifying over the past few days as Paramount Pictures debuted a teaser trailer for Star Trek Into Darkness which gave us our first look at Benedict Cumberbatch's bad guy in action.

While early signs appeared to point towards Khan Noonien Singh of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan fame, over the past few months there's been plenty of support for Gary Mitchell, the God-like antagonist of 'Where No Man Has Gone Before', while other possibilities have ranged from the plausible (Tolian Soran of Star Trek: Generations) to the frankly ridiculous (Evil Picard). However, it seems that Paramount may have inadvertently revealed the character's identity, with a newly-released image from the film accompanied by a caption that refers to Cumberbatch's villain as... wait for it... none other than John Blake John Harrison:


"(Left to right) Zachary Quinto is Spock, Benedict Cumberbatch is John Harrison and Chris Pine is Kirk in STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS from Paramount Pictures and Skydance Productions."

Given the secrecy surrounding Into Darkness, it's unlikely that the studio would make such a schoolboy error so it's probably safe to assume that 'John Harrison' is nothing but a decoy. Of course, there's every chance that 'John Harrison' could be some kind of reworked version of Gary Mitchell. Or Khan. Or just about anybody else, for that matter.

So, while we're still not really any further forward when it comes to Cumberbatch's role, it has been confirmed that Klingons will make an appearance in the forthcoming sequel, with several sites reporting that the iconic villains have been spotted in footage from the film. If you'd looked very closely, you may have noticed them tussling with Benedict Cumberbatch in the teaser trailer (they're sporting the same helmets we saw in the deleted scene from Star Trek), and according to SuperHeroHype, we'll see two of the characters unmasking, and that they'll be sporting "forehead ridges but with ornamental piercings and facial hair out of the original series."

Meanwhile, if you're looking for another Wrath of Khan reference, it's also being reported that Alice Eve (Men in Black 3) will be playing the character of Carol Marcus - the inventor of the Genesis device, and mother to Kirk's only son, David...

Star Trek Into Darkness is due for release on May 17th, 2013, with a cast that includes Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho, Anton Yelchin, Bruce Greenwood, Peter Weller, Nazneen Contractor, Noel Clark and Nolan North.

16th UK Jewish Film Festival Retrospective - A conversation with Sophie Solomon, Artistic Director of the Jewish Music Institute

$
0
0
Paul Risker chats with Sophie Solomon, Artistic Director of the Jewish Music Institute...

Violinist, composer, songwriter, and Artistic Director Sophie Solomon arrived at this year’s UKJFF to perform a live musical accompaniment to the 1925 silent film His People. She has played an important role in the collaboration between the two artistic organisations, which made the event a possibility. Solomon’s directorship of the JMI only commenced fully in January of this year, despite JMI making the announcement in November of last year. “Since taking on the role of Artistic Director of the Jewish Music Institute, I met up with the UK Jewish Film Festival team to talk about possible collaborations; the idea of a live soundtrack seemed like a really exciting one and when the UKJF’s Michael Etherton suggested it, I jumped at the chance.”

More than eighty years after the release of His People, the film was celebrated once again though this time by a modern audience, just as the audiences back in 1925 would have experienced it with live musical accompaniment. The screening served to return cinema to its roots. I was intrigued as to how Sophie would define the experience; whether His People was a film she was familiar with prior to the collaborative project, or whether this collaboration was a journey of discovery; filmically as well as musically. “It was a really amazing journey of discover – His People is a beautiful film showing the amazing, bustling atmosphere of Manhattan’s Lower East Side in the 1920s, and it is very inspiring as a blank canvas. It was an improvised soundtrack so we wanted to have as much freedom as possible to create the music and the atmosphere on the night. Having said that we did have something of a road map, a plan of moods and themes that would work with particular moments and particular characters in the film but we also had a lot of freedom and space for it to go where it wouldn’t naturally go on the night.  We had some lovely unpredictable moments!  It was great fun and a very inspiring evening.”

Live musical accompaniment is becoming increasingly popular. Birmingham Symphony Hall screens a classic horror film accompanied with live score for Halloween every year. Philip Glass performed his new score for Dracula with the Kronos Quartet as part of the Birmingham International Concert Season, and Michael Nyman conducted his new score for Battleship Potemkin to open this year’s BICS. It is a type of event or performance that musicians seem to be embracing, and offers the audience a unique experience, adding to their cinematic discovery or rather rediscovery. “I think as a musician it’s really interesting because it’s a particular type of musical experience – reacting to visual experience.  It’s quite different from writing a song or a piece of music that stands on its own.  It’s a different approach; you tune into the filmmakers’ ideas as well as your own.  My sense is that for an audience it’s an invigorating experience to discover silent films and rediscover old classics.”

As Sophie aforementioned, the performance was improvised on the night of the screening at the UKJFF, and as such it differs from these other performances. The improvisation led to some unpredictable moments that only added to the experience. She explained in more detail the reasons for this creative choice, as well as the benefits and challenges. “I just thought it would be an interesting musical experiment!  Being in the moment, letting the magic happen in response to the film and dealing with the audience’s response to the film created feelings in us as musicians which then influenced the way we played.  It really was a fantastic event!”

Early in her career Sophie had the opportunity to meet the legendary Russian violinst Yehudi Menuhin and cellist Mstislav Rostropovich. I asked her to forgive me for taking a moment to ask about a point of specific interest to me; specifically her memories of meeting these two iconic individuals, and the impact they had on her career. “I was about four years old when my grandfather, who was a huge classical music lover, took me to see Menuhin perform in Manchester at the Free Trade Hall (now the Bridgewater Hall).   We went backstage after the concert to meet him and I remember I was wearing a pretty blue hat!  Menuhin was terribly sweet and charming like a lovely old man, rather like my grandfather in fact.  I remember the concert so well; it’s a very Proustian memory – I remember the concert hall, the plush red velvet seats and curtains and the stage seemed so high because I was so small!   It was really amazing watching him perform.  I was already playing violin at that stage – I’d been playing since I was two and a half – and seeing someone get up on stage and play in such a captivating way was really inspiring.  It left a lasting impression; in fact I remember my grandfather cried he was so moved. As a young violinist meeting such inspiring performers made a huge impression on me.  I was always drawn to Menuhin in particular because I really liked the fact he wasn’t only interested in classical music but that he also embarked on other projects such as jazz with Stephane Grappelli and I always knew that when I was studying violin it opened my mind to those possibilities.”

From aged two to five, Sophie learned to play the violin by ear, and it was not until the age of seven that she began learning to read music. I was intrigued as to how this approach to learning in her early years must have shaped her approach to music as a soloist, songwriter, composer and artistic director, placing for her at least a particular value on an instinctual approach to music. “Yes, I studied the Suzuki method so I learned solely by ear.  My parents were passionate music lovers and they were very encouraging.  Learning by ear for the first five years meant that playing music was practically pre-linguistic so I learned to play the violin as much as I learned to speak.  Subsequently when I play the violin I don’t have to think about what I’m doing and when it comes to playing folk music or improvising or anything that isn’t music on a score, obviously having that very natural connection and ability to feel what’s the right thing to play is very valuable.”

Thanks to Sophie Solomon for taking the time for this interview.

Paul Risker is a freelance writer and contributor to Flickering Myth, Scream The Horror Magazine and The London Film Review.

Comic Book Review - Rocketeer Adventures, Vol. 2

$
0
0
The Rocketeer follows the high-flying adventures of ace stunt pilot Cliff Secord after he finds a mysterious jetpack and takes to the skies. On his action-packed adventures, Cliff must navigate the treacherous waters of maintaining a relationship with his knock-out girlfriend Betty, while continuing to battle evil and injustice – no easy feat!

The first time I crossed paths with The Rocketeer was the 1991 big screen version which fueled my crush on Jennifer Connelly (A Beautiful Mind) who played the part of Betty.  I was not surprised to learn that originator of the comic book, Dave Stevens, was hired by filmmaker Steven Spielberg to create presentation boards for Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) as both embody the rollicking swashbuckling of the B-movie serials of the 1930s.

With Rocketeer Adventures, Volume 2, the high flying spirit and patriotism depicted by Dave Stevens is maintained.  The first of 12 chapters titled The Good Guys explores the theme that end justifies means especially when stand up against injustice.  The second installment misfires as the Looney Tunes inspired Ducketeer tries too hard to emulate the iconic cartoon television series and is drawn in a distracting way which is best describe as a crayon watercolour technique.  The comedic approach is put to far better use in the John Carter of Mars influenced Cliff Secord Warlord of Blargon where a number misunderstandings lead to good intentions causing bad deeds.  The beginnings of a famous superhero is given an interesting spin A Dream of Flying and  Paul Dini from Batman: The Animated Series [Fox, 1992 to 1995] composed the tale Betty’s Big Break where an insecure Cliff spies on his girlfriend while she is filming science fiction Western with rather mixed results.

No fault can be found with the layout and the design of the anthology.  Before each chapter is a cover page with the most dramatic being the one featuring the caption Victory Through Air Power created in a stylish Metropolis (1927) fashion by Darwyn Cooke.  The collection of pin-ups cleverly evokes B-movie posters as they include dinosaurs, a monstrous Nazi, a romantic flight, and a dangerous vixen. Overall Rocketeer Adventures, Volume 2 offers a diverse interpretation of the concept devised by Dave Stevens which will see it continue to soar for years to come.

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.

A new full-length trailer for Disney's The Lone Ranger

$
0
0
With 2012 drawing to a close, the Hollywood studios are starting to showcase some of their big cinematic offerings for the next twelve months; over the past few days we've had our first look at Star Trek Into Darkness, Oblivion and After Earth, and now Walt Disney Pictures has released a brand new full length trailer for its mega-budget Western The Lone Ranger.

Adapted from the classic radio serial and television show of the same name, The Lone Ranger sees Johnny Depp reuniting with Pirates of the Caribbean producer Jerry Bruckheimer and director Gore Verbinski, with Depp starring as the faithful Native American sidekick Tonto to Armie Hammer's (The Social Network, Mirror Mirror) lawman John Reid.

Check out the synopsis, followed by the new trailer below...

"The Lone Ranger is a thrilling adventure infused with action and humor, in which the famed masked hero is brought to life through new eyes. Native American spirit warrior Tonto (Johnny Depp) recounts the untold tales that transformed John Reid (Armie Hammer), a man of the law, into a legend of justice—taking the audience on a runaway train of epic surprises and humorous friction as the two unlikely heroes must learn to work together and fight against greed and corruption."


The Lone Ranger is due for release on July 3rd, 2013, with a supporting cast that includes Tom Wilkinson (Batman Begins), Helena Bonham Carter (The King's Speech), William Fichtner (The Dark Knight), Barry Pepper (True Grit), Ruth Wilson (Anna Karenina) and James Badge Dale (Iron Man 3).

Kevin Smith reveals more details about Clerks III and Hit Somebody

$
0
0
The news broke last Friday that writer/director Kevin Smith's last movie will be Clerks III - ending off his career with the movie he began it with. From all accounts, the news broke a little earlier than planned, although Smith did reveal some more details about the film's production and plans on the latest episode of his Hollywood Babble-On podcast with Ralph Garman and long-time producer Scott Mosier. The episode can be heard here, but in case you don't fancy listening to the two-hour long show (although you should as it's really funny and insightful), here are the highlights:

Smith begins by talking about the genesis of Hit Somebody and how it became a TV show which is taken from episode 99 of Jay and Silent Bob Get Old. He goes into a lot of detail about the disappointment of his Judd Apatow-esque Zack & Miri Make A Porno and how it did just "regular Kevin Smith business" (around the $30million mark domestic) and his subsequent idolising of hockey legend Wayne Gretzky - which lead to the idea of a 30-year spanning double feature, Hit Somebody. After completing the first script, he decided to contact producer Jerry Bruckheimer (because he is a massive hockey fan and the two worked together on Coyote Ugly) for some advice on who to speak to for funding. Bruckheimer told Smith that it was the best thing he'd ever written (which Smith also agrees with), but informed him that he'd also been struggling for 10 years to get a hockey based movie made by Disney.

With this news, Smith realised that if one of Hollywood's biggest producers couldn't get his hockey movie off the ground then there was no chance for him. With that, he began to trim the two scripts down so that he could source funding from other people but was reluctant to do so as it tampered with the story and nuances. It wasn't until his best friend Jason Mewes suggested that Smith turn the film into a TV mini-series that Hit Somebody stopped being Kevin Smith's swansong from filmmaking. As an update, he has been working on the TV version of the script for 6-8 months and they have a TV network interested (but he can't say who).


With the void of "final movie" needing to be filled, he decided to revisit the movie that put him on the map in the first place - Clerks. However, this has led to problems of its own. As it currently stands, Kevin Smith and his lawyers have been conducting an audit of the Weinsteins due to some complications with the money from Clerks II. In particular, producer Scott Mosier and Jeff Anderson (who played Randall in both movies) are at odds with the Weinsteins and are reluctant to work with them until all of these issues have been resolved. It sounds like a really complicated and messy situation that could slow down the production of Clerks III. Smith has met with Bob Weinstein and has pitched the movie to him and is also considering going back to Miramax who own the rights to the Clerks name (the loophole being they are making a sequel to Clerks and not Clerks II). Although, even if they go with Miramax, they still have to deal with the Weinsteins.

But even with these dealings and meetings, the fact still remains - Jeff Anderson isn't willing to sign on and Scott Mosier doesn't want to work with the Weinsteins until the audit of Clerks II is finished. While losing Mosier would be a disappointment, the film cannot be made without Jeff Anderson who Smith believes is the embodiment of the Clerks movies. However, I think Smith is quietly confident he can convince him (once the Weinstein issues are done and dusted) as Anderson was reluctant to join Clerks II because he feared it would taint the love people have for the original movie but ended up loving the movie.

While the podcast deals mostly with the issues between the Weinsteins and Kevin Smith and company, Smith has revealed some details of the story for Clerks III.

The film, like the first movie, is to be made in black and white, although Smith doesn't want to just make it digitally to then remove the colour in post. The basic plot he did reveal (which wasn't much) suggests that it will revolve around Randall (which will be nice considering Dante was the focal point of the previous two movies) as a man who begins to question his life of obsessing over movies (was it all worthwhile?). According to Smith, of the few people he's told the story too, he hasn't been able to finish it without crying by the end. He also goes on to say that Clerks was a movie about his twenties and Clerks II was about moving into his thirties, so Clerks III will be his thoughts on life as a man in his forties. The other key thing to note from the podcast is that the film is to be crowd funded either via their own site (which they had planned to do for Red State) or Kickstarter.

Too long; didn't read? Basically - Kevin Smith, Jason Mewes and Brian O'Halloran are on board for Clerks III, but Scott Mosier and Jeff Anderson are yet to sign on for the movie and I don't think Smith wants to make it without all five components in place. The story is finished and no script has been written but he would like to aim for a Sundance premier in 2014 to mark the 20th anniversary of Clerks. Back when Hit Somebody was to be his final movie, he suggested that a lot of people he'd worked with in the past would be making an appearance in the movie so I think it's fair to assume that we'll see cameos from Ben Affleck, Jason Lee, Walt Flanagan, Bryan Johnson, Joey Lauren Adams, Ethan Suplee and maybe even Marilyn Ghigliotti and Lisa Spoonhauer (the female leads from the original movie). We should also assume (given the ending of the movie) that we'll see Trevor Fehrman and Rosario Dawson reprising their roles from Clerks II.

I highly recommend listening to the podcast to hear all of this straight from the horse's mouth as it's a great insight into the inner workings of the Hollywood system and how people make money. Clerks III would be the perfect movie for Kevin Smith to end his career on and it being released on the 20th anniversary of the original movie would be a nice end to his tale, but getting there won't be an easy task. With only two years to deal with the audit, convince Jeff Anderson, complete a script and secure enough crowd funding, a 2014 release date for Clerks III could be quite the stretch.

Man of Steel trailer 2 released online

$
0
0
Ahead of its arrival on the big screen with The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey later this week, the second trailer for director Zack Snyder's (300, Watchmen) hotly-anticipated Superman reboot Man of Steel has been released online this afternoon, and you can check it out right here.

Based on a story by Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight Rises) and David S. Goyer (Batman Begins), Man of Steel sees Henry Cavill (Immortals) stepping in to the role of Clark Kent / Superman for what Warner Bros. is hoping will serve as the first step on the road to Justice League.

The full-length trailer offers up plenty of new footage, giving us our first look at the likes of Amy Adams (The Fighter) as Lois Lane, Kevin Costner (Dances with Wolves) as Jonathan Kent, Diane Lane (Unfaithful) as Martha Kent, Russell Crowe (Les Miserables) as Jor-El, Ayelet Zurer (Angels and Demons) as Lara Lor-Van and Laurence Fishburne (The Matrix) as Perry White - not to mention a brief shot of Michael Shannon (Revolutionary Road), who stars as Kal-El's Kryptonian nemesis General Zod.

Oh, and it's also packed with glimpses at some of the epic action sequences that Snyder looks to have in store for us, including the destruction of Krypton and what we can only presume to be the film's climactic showdown in Metropolis, which has the potential to make Superman II's final battle seem like a playground scrap in comparison...


Man of Steel is set for release on June 14th, 2013.

Rise of the Guardians rises to the top of the UK box office chart

$
0
0
UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 7th to Sunday 9th December 2012...

After a rather underwhelming third-placed opening last weekend, DreamWorks Animation's festive offering Rise of the Guardians has climbed to first place at the second time of asking, with a haul of £1.6m (down just 19% from its debut) enough to knock the UK's highest-grossing film of all time, Skyfall, down into second.

Bond's 50th anniversary adventure still managed to pull in £1.43m, pushing the film ever-closer towards the £100m mark on home soil, while Martin McDonagh's Seven Psychopaths was the only new entry to figure in the top ten, with a £1,121,679 debut enough to take third.

Elsewhere in the chart The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 slips two places to fourth in its fourth weekend, with Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger!, Silver Linings Playbook and Great Expectations all falling one spot apiece to occupy fifth, sixth and seventh respectively. Meanwhile, the bottom three are unchanged this weekend as Argo, End of Watch and Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted fill out positions eight through ten once again.

Number one this time last year: Puss in Boots

1. Rise of the Guardians, £1,602,689 weekend; £4,062,292 total (2 weeks)
2. Skyfall, £1,428,708 weekend; £96,333,036 total (7 weeks)
3. Seven Psychopaths, £1,121,679 weekend (New)
4. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2, £980,190 weekend; £33,384,110 total (4 weeks)
5. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger!, £966,400 weekend; £4,376,499 total (3 weeks)
6. Silver Linings Playbook, £446,324 weekend; £3,606,760 total (3 weeks)
7. Great Expectations, £339,375 weekend; £1,356,923 total (2 weeks)
8. Argo, £216,892 weekend; £4,925,327 total (5 weeks)
9. End of Watch, £143,674 weekend; £1,668,261 total (3 weeks)
10. Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted, £138,753 weekend; £21,925,195 total (8 weeks)

Incoming...

Peter Jackson takes us back to Middle-earth this coming Thursday with the release of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (cert. 12A) [read our review here], while Friday's newcomers include Disney animation Tinkerbell and the Secret of the Wings (cert. U), British sci-fi thriller U.F.O. (cert. TBC), comedy drama Smashed (cert. 15) and a 50th anniversary reissue of the Robert Aldrich classic What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (cert. 12A).

DC Comics announces Before Watchmen deluxe hardcover collections

$
0
0
DC Comics has announced that it will be releasing the best-selling Before Watchmen comic book series in four deluxe hardcover collected editions next July, with each volume containing two of the controversial Watchmen prequels. Here's the full details for each of the titles, which will retail at $29.99 apiece...

Before Watchmen: Volume 1 - Minutemen and Silk Spectre - released July 9th, 2013:


The critically acclaimed and Eisner Award-winning creator of DC: THE NEW FRONTIER Darwyn Cooke lends his talents MINUTEMEN. As the predecessor to the Watchmen, the Minutemen were assembled to fight against a world that have more and more rapidly begun to spin out of control. Can these heroes from completely different backgrounds and with completely different attitudes on crime come together? Or will they fall apart before they begin?

SILK SPECTRE takes an introspective look at the WATCHMEN feature player's struggles with her overbearing superhero mother and her scattered path toward taking the mantle of the Silk Spectre. With gorgeous art by co-writer and illustrator Amanda Conner (POWER GIRL), SILK SPECTRE takes a very different perspective at the world of BEFORE WATCHMEN.


Collects BEFORE WATCHMEN: MINUTEMEN 1-6 and BEFORE WATCHMEN: SILK SPECTRE 1-4.


Before Watchmen: Volume 2 - Comedian and Rorschach - released July 16th, 2013:



Eisner Award-winning writer and creator of 100 BULLETS Brian Azzarello brings his gritty, nuanced storytelling to these two recognizable characters. In RORSCHACH, Azzarello again teams with superstar artist Lee Bermejo (JOKER, LUTHOR, BATMAN/DEATHBLOW) to illustrate how one of most dangerous vigilantes the comic world has ever seen became even darker. COMEDIAN, featuring art by J.G. Jones (FINAL CRISIS, WANTED), plants the famed war hero within the context of American history, as we find out how the Vietnam War and the Kennedy assassination revolve around him.

Collects BEFORE WATCHMEN: COMEDIAN 1-6 and BEFORE WATCHMEN: RORSCHACH 1-4.



Before Watchmen: Volume 3 - Night Owl and Dr. Manhattan - released July 23rd, 2013:


Discover what happened before WATCHMEN as writer J. Michael Straczynski is joined by Andy Kubert and the legendary Joe Kubert to take flight with the gadget-savvy vigilante known as Nite Owl! And then in BEFORE WATCHMEN: DR. MANHATTAN, JMS teams with fan-favorite artist Adam Hughes on the all-powerful super-man Dr. Manhattan. For Dr. Manhattan, past, present, and future are one and the same. But as he observes the events of his life, do they remain the same? Or are they changed? The very fact of his existence may have altered the nature of what will or will not be...

Collects BEFORE WATCHMEN: NITE OWL #1-4 and BEFORE WATCHMEN: DR. MANHATTAN #1-4.



Before Watchmen: Volume 4 - Ozymandias and Curse of the Crimson Corsair - released July 30th, 2013:

 
Discover what happened before WATCHMEN. The team of legendary writer Len Wein and acclaimed artist Jae Lee--in his first DC Comics' work in nearly a decade--delve into the mind of the smartest man in the world: Ozymandias. How does one go from the son of immigrant parents to becoming the world's smartest man? Adrian Veidt begins his journey, both spiritual and physical, that will one day make him one of the most pivotal players in the world-changing events of WATCHMEN.

Collects BEFORE WATCHMEN: OZYMANDIAS #1-6 and "CURSE OF THE CRIMSON CORSAIR." 


16th UK Jewish Film Festival Retrospective Review - Paris-Manhattan (2012)

$
0
0
Paris-Manhattan, 2012.

Directed by Sophie Lellouche.
Starring Alice Taglioni, Patrick Bruel, Marine Delterme, Michel Aumont and Woody Allen.


SYNOPSIS:

Local Pharmacist Alice (Alice Taglioni) is struggling to find someone who can live up to the image of her ideal man: Woody Allen. Surrounded by relationship dramas and obsessed with the films of Woody Allen, can new love interest Victor (Patrick Bruel), convince Alice to be courageous and fall in love?


Paris-Manhattan, the directorial feature debut from Sophie Lellouche, is the French writer-director's love letter to the films of Woody Allen. It is a debut defined by challenges, of a willingness to step into the shadow of a great American auteur, whilst confronting the prospect of the marathon that is a feature film with only the 1999 short film Dieu, que la nature est bien faite! to her name.

Lellouche’s willingness to step into the shadow of Woody Allen is both successful and problematic. The early scenes in which Alice interacts with Woody are full of humour, possessing a genuine creativity. Lellouche’s individual voice and therefore her central protagonist do not permit Woody to intrude on a world he has inspired, and not created. It is not long before the references to Woody feel a little heavy handed, both the verbal and the visual; especially in the party discussion centred on whether Manhattan has aged well or not? Such moments create an impression that they are present for effect as opposed to creating substance for the narrative. The scenes in the film consequently see-saw, and Allen’s presence is especially effective in the opening scenes, as a sub-conscious presence, and as the root of Alice’s worldview. A love letter to the cinema of her idol, Allen’s cameo is perhaps more counterproductive, Allen more suited to being an influential presence rather than a physical one.

Whilst Allen’s presence is intrusive, and for some will present a certain conundrum as to whether Lellouche is simply paying homage or is in fact trying to discover and express her own voice, there is much to appreciate - if you are able to avoid the inevitable comparisons between Lellouche and Allen. She uses her inspiration to create a world that whilst not as elaborate or unique as some, sees her create a set of entertaining family dramas that work for the film. Whilst Alice may be the central protagonist it is Victor who brings a sense of excitement or renewal to her character, at a time when her Woody Allen obsessed and love struggling ventures quickly become tiresome. At times Alice’s sister Hélène (Marine Delterme) and husband Pierre (Louis-Do de Lencquesaing) meeting in an ‘Allenesque’ way or Pierre jilting Alice for her sister may seem more intriguing with their relationship dramas, as do Alice and Hélène’s parents. Lellouche deliberately offsets these characters against Alice, who serves to interrogate the nature of relationships as she pursues her own idea of happiness. She is the observant outsider noticing the inherent pitfalls and dramas, criticising Hélène and Pierre’s dramas, some of which are only dramas to the external observer who may share a different view of love. The film is about courage and a character realising a truth that goes against their worldview. As Victor tells Alice, “Your dreams are banal. Reality offers better than that.”

Despite this being her first feature film, and with only one short to her name, Lellouche presents herself as a filmmaker who knows how to tell a story. She inspires some wonderfully comedic performances from her actors, staggering the ensuing dramas and revelations, constructing her characters journey with a focus, which helps in those moments when the film is stifled by Allen’s presence. Lellouche also couples her skill as a visual storyteller, with writing full of humorous wit.

In discussing a director’s first film, Lellouche told me, “This is a moment where you get inspiration from all directors and then find your own identity. The second time it will be different. You know what you like, what you don’t, what you can work with. First movies are very different, they are dreams; what you expect cinema to be.” There is a definite sense of an original voice here, as Lellouche perhaps makes with her inspirations. She side-steps the love triangle, a narrative device that has made modern romantic comedies feel worn and tired, and instead remains committed to her attempt at creating a romantic-comedy with an edgier take on relationships. The film inevitably builds to an unsurprising crescendo, but the film never attempts to suggest originality. The intellectual Alice character created here is certainly hindered at times by Lellouche’s inspirations, reminding us of classic films that have presented us with iconic intellectual characters in the context of a comedy, and the moments of more inventive creativity are too sparingly exhibited. The cast and those moments however do endear the film to its audience, along with the enjoyable wit that permeates the film; that whilst not the deft touch of Allen, is nonetheless possible to appreciate.

A light-weight romantic comedy, and by no means a French version of (500) Days of Summer, Paris-Manhattan is nonetheless a good humoured film. It left me with a warm sense of feeling. Rather fitting to its subject, and like the couples featured, it frustrated just as much as it entertained.

Flickering Myth Rating - Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★

Paul Risker is a freelance writer and contributor to Flickering Myth, Scream The Horror Magazine and The London Film Review.

16th UK Jewish Film Festival Retrospective - A conversation with Sophie Lellouche, writer-director of Paris-Manhattan

$
0
0
Paul Risker chats with Sophie Lellouche, writer-director of Paris-Manhattan...

The film chosen to open this year’s 16th UK Jewish Film Festival was the romantic comedy Paris-Manhattan, the directorial feature debut of young French writer-director Sophie Lellouche. It is an eventful first attempt at a feature film, the screenplay written over a long seven year stretch, at the end of which it afforded her the opportunity to direct her idol, Woody Allen, in a cameo role. “It was roughly six years ago.” She corrects me. “For the first four years, I started and stopped. I lost producers, found new producers. When you don’t know anyone in the industry it is a very long and difficult process. Once Woody Allen had read the script and he said yes, that is the moment I felt that I could make movies. I felt like I had the seal of approval.”

Inevitably there was the time before she received what she called the “seal of approval” from the great American auteur, resolving the difficulty of finding a producer for her first feature with only her sole 1999 short film to her name. For any filmmaker, there is often that inspirational moment that aligns their destiny with filmmaking. Sophie told me, “There were two things that led me to filmmaking. Woody Allen was one of the reasons. When I was 15 years old, each time I watched a Woody Allen film, I was so over-whelmed by his talent.” Her enthusiasm for Allen’s cinema is at the heart of Paris-Manhattan. Whereas Allen’s worldview can be interpreted as cynical, Lellouche explained that for her, “There was so much positivity as well as negativity.” In a moment of honesty she remarked, “ I didn’t think I had enough talent be become a director, but movies are about being yourself even if you are not as good as you imagine. It is about growing, learning, becoming an adult.”

Through the film’s title, Lellouche connects her Parisian protagonist with her idol, whilst the deliberate choice of words reminds of Allen’s recent Midnight in Paris, as well as classic 1979 film Manhattan. “She is from Paris, Woody Allen is from Manhattan, it is the idea of a trip by the mind. I love Paris as much as Woody Allen loves Manhattan.”

It is one thing to write and a direct a film inspired by the cinema of Woody Allen, but the opportunity to direct him was, “Magic! It was like a dream come true. “ The dream becoming reality connects Lellouche to Jean-Luc Godard, the enfant terrible of the French New Wave, who directed Allen in King Lear (1987). “ He was only on set for one hour, but I felt every second of the day, every moment was intense. It was something special.” She confessed, “I didn’t direct him. He knew what to do and it was just perfect.”

The challenge for all young storytellers is to express their own creative voice, and in light of this consideration, Lellouche bravely steps into the shadow of a great American auteur. Placing Woody Allen at the heart of her protagonist’s character, as well as the film’s more general affectionate nods to cinema inevitably makes this a more hazardous challenge. Cinematic tributes are fraught with an inherent awkwardness if the director permits the creative influence to intrude on their own auteurial voice. The challenge of a young filmmaker I would assume is to use these inevitable creative influences as a means to strengthen her own creative presence. “Interesting, because I know today that Paris-Manhattan can only be a first movie. This is a moment where you get inspiration from all directors and then find your own identity. The second time it will be different, you know what you like, what you don’t, what you can work with. First movies are very different, they are dreams, what you expect cinema to be. I do not want to make another romantic comedy but maybe just a comedy. There is truce in comedy. I want to make movies like champagne; light, elegant and jumping.”

As I enquired about her future projects, she explained, “It is too early to talk about a second movie”, adding that she, “Still writing and working very hard on it.”

Thanks to Sophie Lellouche for taking the time for this interview.

Paul Risker is a freelance writer and contributor to Flickering Myth, Scream The Horror Magazine and The London Film Review.
Viewing all 7138 articles
Browse latest View live